Data Points used in Mapping the Surficial Geology of the Alton Quadrangle (Illinois portion), Madison County, Illinois

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

    Title:
    Data Points used in Mapping the Surficial Geology of the Alton Quadrangle (Illinois portion), Madison County, Illinois
    Abstract:
    This metadata file describes both an ArcInfo point coverage and the shape file derived from the coverage. The data depict the locations of stratigraphic test holes, outcrops, ISGS field notes, water wells, and engineering borings used to map the surficial geology of the 7.5-minute Alton quadrangle in Illinois.

    The data type and an unique ID are included for each point. Also included for a subset of points are data fields that were used to contour the clay content of the Glasford Formation and the percentage of illite in the clay mineral fraction of the Glasford, as well as fields for magnetic susceptibility and the soil horizon sampled. A companion word processing document named data_pt.doc provides further details.

    The data were published in 1999 on an ISGS Illinois Geologic Quadrangle entitled Surficial Geology Map, Alton Quadrangle (Illinois Portion) Madison County, Illinois by David Grimley. These data do not include all the information on the published map. Refer to the published map for a complete explanation of the Quaternary geology of the Alton quadrangle.

    The nominal scale is 1:24,000.

  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Grimley, David A. , 1999, Data Points used in Mapping the Surficial Geology of the Alton Quadrangle (Illinois portion), Madison County, Illinois: ISGS Digital Database Wells and Borings Database, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Grimley, David A. , 1999, Surficial Geology Map, Alton Quadrangle (Illinois portion), Madison County, Illinois: Illinois Geologic Quadrangle (IGQ) Alton SG, Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -90.249906
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -90.125270
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 38.998080
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 38.878395

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Calendar_Date: 1999
    Currentness_Reference: publication date of source map

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):

      • Entity point (86)
      • Point (9)

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.000001. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.000001. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees.

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.000000.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Attribute items are in typical Arc/Info feature class format. Those requiring additional explanation are:

    Polygon attributes:

     PTCODE: The type of data point
     1 = stratigraphic test hole
     2 = outcrop examined
     3 = ISGS field note description
     4 = water well/engineering boring
    
     ID:  An unique identifier for the point.
     Stratigraphic test holes have a prefix of "ALT", for example "ALT-1"
     Outcrops examined have a suffix of "f", for example "1f"
     ISGS field note descriptions are prefixed with "FN", for example "FN1"
     Water wells and engineering borings are a 5-digit number.  This number
     can be related to the ISGS borehole database and to records in the ISGS
     Geological Records Unit using the COUNTY NUMBER segment of the API
     number field.
    
    Laboratory data were determined on many samples of calcareous and relatively unaltered glacial till. Data from till deposited during the Illinois Episode (Glasford Formation) are recorded in the items CLAY_PCT, ILLITE_PCT, MAG_SUS, and HORIZON, and were used for contouring the illite and clay mineral data. During our mapping, we became interested in lateral trends of the lithology of the Glasford Formation which may have resulted from the incorporation of various bedrock and surficial materials as glacial ice advanced towards the Mississippi Valley. Since weathering is also an important factor, the horizon sampled is noted.

     HORIZON: The horizon from which the sample was obtained.
     B = fairly weathered, B horizon of the soil profile
     C = calcareous and oxidized, C horizon of soil profile
     D = calcareous and unoxidized, D horizon of soil profile
     avg = indicates an average of several samples
    
    CLAY_PCT: Clay percentage (<4 µm fraction) was measured by hydrometer methods and are of the <2 mm fraction. A value of zero indicates no data were acquired.

    ILLITE_PCT: Illite percentage is that estimated by X-ray diffraction in the <2 µm clay mineral fraction . Peak intensities were determined after glycolation of clay mineral slides. Peak intensity factors of 3x for illite [10 Å peak], 2x for kaolinite plus chlorite [7 Å peak], and 1x for expandable clay minerals [17 Å peak] were applied to samples. Clay mineral analyses are courtesy of Herb Glass, Illinois State Geological Survey. A value of zero indicates no data were acquired.

    MAG_SUS: Magnetic susceptibility (MS) were measured with a Bartington MS2 meter and probe in the field or on samples in the laboratory. The measurements are a ratio of the induced field to the applied magnetic field. The two-digit numbers are in 10 exp -5 (SI units). Higher numbers generally mean a greater content of magnetite. A value of zero indicates no data were acquired.

    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: none


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

    • David A. Grimley

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

     Mapping contributions: E.D. McKay, J.A. Devera, B.F. Denny
     Clay mineralogy: H.D. Glass
     Data automation:  J. Schoen, C. Abert, T. McTighe
     GIS processing:  C. Abert, D. Nelson
     Documentation:  D. Nelson
     QA/QC:  D. Nelson, C. Abert, R. Krumm
    

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Illinois State Geological Survey
    GIS Database Administrator
    615 East Peabody Drive
    Champaign, Illinois 61820
    USA

    217-333-4747 (voice)
    isgs@isgs.uiuc.edu

    Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Central Time, Monday-Friday
    Contact_Instructions:
    When contacting us, please have this metadata file readily available so we can identify the data set of interest and the individual most appropriate to assist you.


Why was the data set created?

These data are intended to provide the map users with the detailed field information that was used to map the Quaternary geologic materials in the Alton quadrangle. The data are appropriate regional thematic analysis. The data are not appropriate as a geodetic or engineering base, nor do they replace the need for detailed site-specific studies.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Unknown (process 1 of 1)
    no information

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

    No attribute accuracy report.

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    The horizontal accuracy of data points is variable. The locations of points for stratigraphic test holes and outcrops examined are generally in compliance with National Mapping Standards for 1:24,000-scale maps.

    Points derived from the ISGS borehole database and previously collected ISGS field note descriptions are generally accurate to 100 feet, however, it is possible that some points could have inaccuracy on the order of 2500 feet. Refer to the companion word processing document entitled data_pt.doc for more detailed location information for data points.

    Relatively, locations of outcrops and stratigraphic test holes have higher accuracy and locations of water wells and previous field notes have a greater possibility of error.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

    Some elevations were estimated from topographic maps and could be as much as five feet in error. Most elevations do not have an associated estimate of accuracy.

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    No completeness report. Mapping techniques are described on the published map.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    A logical consistency review was performed in May, 2002. The following checks were made:

    Data set was DESCRIBED and coverage files listed to determine the feature types present. In this data set, the following feature types were found and checked: points. The presence of spatial indices was also checked.

    For PAT files, each ITEM was checked for the following:

    - DOMAIN of allowable values
    - adherence of values to the DOMAIN
    - definition of ITEMS
    - requirement of all UNIQUE values for an item
    - logic of ITEMS REDEFINED over other ITEMS
    - length of ITEM name as regards conversion to shape file
    
    BUILD statuses of data sets were checked, as were LABELERRORS and NODEERRORS (where appropriate), and PROJECTION definition.

    The presence of a DBLBND file was verified.

    The presence and location of TICS were checked.

    Point topology present. Boundary values appropriate for map projection and map units. "Fuzzy" tolerance is zero and therefore meaningless. AAT items with long name were renamed and tics were replaced. COVER-ID values were recalculated to be unique. There are no attribute values outside the appropriate domains.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints:
Reproduction or redistribution of copyrighted digital data sets or products derived therefrom outside of licensee organization or entity is expressly forbidden. The only exception is redistribution to consultants working for the licensee, and then only for purposes, related to work for the licensee. Such consultants may not further reproduce or redistribute these data sets. None of these data shall be electronically duplicated on magnetic or optical media for use by others, in whole or in part, without permission of the appropriate custodial division within DNR.

Any hardcopies utilizing DNR data sets shall clearly indicate their source. If the licensee has modified the data in any way they are obligated to describe the types of modifications they have performed on the hardcopy map. Licensee specifically agrees not to misrepresent DNR data sets, nor to imply that changes they made were approved by DNR.

These data are not to be used for commercial profit.

These data should not be used at scales greater than 1:24,000.

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Illinois State Geological Survey
    GIS Database Administrator
    615 East Peabody Drive
    Champaign, Illinois 61820
    USA

    217-333-4747 (voice)
    isgs@isgs.uiuc.edu

    Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Central Time, Monday-Friday
    Contact_Instructions:
    When contacting us, please have this metadata file readily available so we can identify the data set of interest and the individual most appropriate to assist you.
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    The Illinois Department of Natural Resources (DNR) provides these geographic data "as is." DNR makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of information contained in the geographic data. DNR further makes no warranties, either expressed or implied as to any other matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers of DNR, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by DNR regarding the use of these data on any other system, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty.

    In no event shall the DNR have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of use of or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of the delivery, installation, operation, or support by DNR.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 22-May-2002
Last Reviewed: 21-May-2002

Metadata author:
Illinois State Geological Survey
c/o REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
GIS Database Administrator
615 East Peabody Drive
Champaign, Illinois 61820
USA

217-333-4747 (voice)
isgs@isgs.uiuc.edu

Hours_of_Service: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Central Time, Monday-Friday
Contact_Instructions:
When contacting us, please have this metadata file readily available so we can identify the data set of interest and the individual most appropriate to assist you.
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


Visit the Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data Clearinghouse

Generated by mp version 2.7.16 on Wed May 22 08:29:24 2002